Chicago police made fewer than 3,200 marijuana-related arrests in 2017—the lowest number since 1968, according to an analysis of Chicago Police Department data. 

While Illinois has made steady progress decriminalizing marijuana and has legalized it for medical use, the state has yet to follow nine others that have cleared the path for recreational use. 

Since July 2017, Illinois law has determined the possession of up to 10 grams of cannabis carries only a civil penalty punishable by a maximum $200 fine. 

However, decriminalization does not address the historical problem with prohibition as an ineffective deterrent because a large percent of the population continue to use marijuana, whether it is legal or not, said Chris Lindsey, senior legislative council for the Marijuana Policy Project, a national organization for cannabis policy reform. 

State Sen. Heather Steans, D-Chicago, and state Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago, introduced Senate Bill 316 and House Bill 2353, respectively, in March 2017 to legalize the sale of adult-use cannabis and create necessary regulations and taxation. 

“Steans and Cassidy are both mothers with teenage children,” said Rose Ashby, the legislators’ field director. “Their goal is public safety. They are not pro-[marijuana], they are anti-prohibition.” 

Since the bills were introduced, Steans and Cassidy have held public hearings about the economic development, public safety and the public health implications of recreational cannabis, Ashby said. 

The legislation would allow      Illinois residents over the age of 21 to possess up to 28 grams of cannabis and own up to five cannabis plants. It would also create a tax structure that encourages competition and diverts users from the black market, according to state legislative records. 

“Right now, all the money being spent on marijuana is going into the pockets of criminals and cartels,” Steans said in a press release. “In a regulated system, the money would go to licensed, tax-paying businesses, and generate hundreds of millions of dollars per year in revenue for our state.” 

Not everyone is sold on the proposal, however. Kevin Sabet, president of a national group called Smart Approaches to Marijuana, has been advocating against legalization in Illinois.

Sabet argues that recreational marijuana will create an industry similar to Big Tobacco. Because alcohol and tobacco taxes have not generated enough state revenue, recreational marijuana profit as a solution to revenue issues is a false promise and bogus argument, Sabet said. 

However, twelve percent of state revenues come from taxes on cigarettes, liquor and insurance, totaling $3.9 billion in 2017, according to data from the Governor’s Office of Management and Budget.

Under the proposed legislation, all products would be tested for potency and businesses would be required to print label warnings. Consuming cannabis in public or while driving would remain illegal.

“We can fix the social justice issues with our laws without legalizing marijuana,” Sabet said. “But with legalization we get a lot more than what we bargained for and a new industry that pushes products, candies, edibles in a way that the tobacco industry did. Why would we want to legitimize another tobacco industry? We should focus on awareness and education about this very misunderstood drug.” 

In a 2017 survey by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 750,000 Illinois adults  reported that they had used cannabis within the past month. However, only 25,600 individuals are registered with the state’s medical cannabis program. 

Lindsey said Illinois has an advantage with the existing, highly regulated medical cannabis program. 

“That system can be leveraged for the adult non-medical market, so instead of serving 25,000 patients across the state, they could be serving the hundreds of thousands of people who are regular marijuana consumers who get all of their cannabis from criminal organizations,” he said. 

 Medical marijuana was legal in 19 other states before state law allowed it in Illinois in 2013. Nine states and D.C. have gone beyond decriminalization and medicinal cannabis by legalizing recreational marijuana. While Illinois has held back from making a decision, legislators have spoken with other states about their programs. 

But it is important that Illinois consider what will be best for the state, Lindsey said.

“The Illinois form of legalization will not look like Colorado’s,” he said. “Illinois will be uniquely Illinois and will be based on its own program, experiences and what it prefers.” 

(2) comments


While a step in the right direction, a major problem with the prohibition (decriminalization is still prohibition) of cannabis is that it leaves its sale in the same criminal underground markets that sell truly dangerous drugs like cocaine, heroin and meth. Since cannabis is one of the safest and most popular recreational drugs in the U.S., placing it there significantly strengthens those markets and their reach. With no legal recourse for buyers and dealers to resolve disputes, as was the case with alcohol prohibition, cannabis prohibition significantly increases the crime associated with these markets and further empowers their criminal enterprise. Only legalization will eliminate the crime associated with cannabis prohibition and weaken the hard drug market, decriminalization will not do this.

With decriminalization and its underground market there will remain little quality control. There will remain contaminants, anything from molds and pesticides to other drugs, and nothing to effectively prevent regular underage sales. In addition, the government collects no tax money on the sale which can be used for various beneficial programs, including treatment for all drugs, including alcohol. Though tax levels in the legal market must be carefully set to avoid prohibitively high prices as this would simply keep the majority of the cannabis market underground.


The smartest approach to marijuana begins with honest, accurate, balanced information.

Nearly every claim by SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana) has been disputed by the scientific community. This makes every monetary claim groundless for the most part. Also in their reports they do not even attempt include any data regarding positives of legalization and where money will be saved (far less prosecution for sales/possession, etc).

SAM founders/leaders have strong ties to the addiction treatment industry which will greatly benefit from forced court-related treatment referrals that inevitably occur under prohibition. This is likely part of the reason why they fight legalization.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.